Do Lions Have Manes? For Children, Generics Are About Kinds Rather Than Quantities

53Citations
Citations of this article
71Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Generic statements (e.g., "Lions have manes") make claims about kinds (e.g., lions as a category) and, for adults, are distinct from quantificational statements (e.g., "Most lions have manes"), which make claims about how many individuals have a given property. This article examined whether young children also understand that generics do not depend purely on quantitative information. Five-year-olds (n=36) evaluated pairs of questions expressing properties that were matched in prevalence but varied in whether adults accept them as generically true (e.g., "Do lions have manes?" [true] vs. "Are lions boys?" [false]). Results demonstrated that children evaluate generics based on more than just quantitative information. Data suggest that even young children recognize that generics make claims about kinds. © 2012 The Authors. Child Development © 2012 Society for Research in Child Development, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brandone, A. C., Cimpian, A., Leslie, S. J., & Gelman, S. A. (2012). Do Lions Have Manes? For Children, Generics Are About Kinds Rather Than Quantities. Child Development, 83(2), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01708.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free