‘Making’, ‘taking’ and the material political economy of algorithmic trading

46Citations
Citations of this article
62Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Drawing upon interviews with 72 practitioners of automated, ultrafast high-frequency trading (HFT), this paper identifies the most salient divide within HFT: between algorithms, trading groups and firms that specialize in ‘making’ (in adding bids to buy and offers to sell to exchanges’ electronic order books) and those that specialize in ‘taking’ (in executing against existing bids and offers in those order books). The paper explores how ‘making’ and ‘taking’ algorithms interact, emphasizing the materiality of that interaction (including, e.g. the surprising effect on it of rain), and suggesting the importance of the ‘material political economy’ of algorithmic trading: the shaping of that trading, in economically consequential ways, by material orderings that could be different.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

MacKenzie, D. (2018). ‘Making’, ‘taking’ and the material political economy of algorithmic trading. Economy and Society, 47(4), 501–523. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085147.2018.1528076

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free