Modeling multisystem biological risk in later life: Allostatic load in the lothian birth cohort study 1936

27Citations
Citations of this article
51Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate and replicate a multisystem model of biological risk, or allostatic load, in a sample of generally healthy older adults. Methods: Multigroup confirmatory factor analysis (MG-CFA) was applied to data from the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 (n=726). Blood samples were taken at a physical examination. Three markers of inflammation (fibrinogen, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein), five metabolic markers (high- and low-density lipoprotein, body mass index, glycated hemoglobin, and triglyceride), and blood pressure (mean sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure) were used to estimate a second-order CFA model of allostatic load. Our sample was split into those taking antihypertensive, anti-inflammatory, lipid-lowering, and diabetes medications (n=470), and those who were not (n=256), in order to test the stability of the CFA model across groups. Results: In the nonmedicated sample, a second-order allostatic load model showed good fit to the data. However, the second-order model failed to estimate in the medicated group. The factor correlations between blood pressure and inflammation and metabolism were smaller in magnitude in the medicated group. Invariance analysis on the first-order measurement model suggested significant differences across groups in the associations of low-density lipoprotein and HbA1c with metabolism. Conclusions: Reliable measurement of allostatic load is possible in ageing samples free of medications but is complicated in the presence of medications. MG-CFA represents a highly versatile method for the analysis of allostatic load. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 25:538-543, 2013. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Booth, T., Starr, J. M., & Deary, I. (2013). Modeling multisystem biological risk in later life: Allostatic load in the lothian birth cohort study 1936. American Journal of Human Biology, 25(4), 538–543. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.22406

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free