Testing the viability of Henczel's information audit methodology in practice

  • Raliphada L
  • Botha D
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Effective information management is of crucial importance to the survival of organisations in the 21st century. This is due to the emergence and dominance of information as an economic resource in the information economy. One of the building blocks and a cornerstone of information management is the information audit. It is one of the methods that can be used to identify and determine the value, functioning, evaluation and utility of information resources, and is conducted to establish or improve effective information management within an organisation. There are various methodologies that can be used to conduct an information audit, such as the methodologies of Barker (1990), Orna (1990), Stanat (1990), Hamilton (1993) and Swash (1997) and Henczel's methodology. The aim of this study is to test the viability of Henzcel's (2000) methodology within the context of the Chief Directorate of Statistical Information Services. This particular methodology comprises seven stages, namely: planning, data collection, data analysis, data evaluation, communicating recommendations and the continuum. The study, which included the first five stages of the methodology, indicated that this particular methodology is viable and practical in nature. The advantages and the disadvantages of the methodology are discussed and recommendations are made to ensure the successful implementation and use of Henzcel's methodology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]Copyright of South African Journal of Libraries & Information Science is the property of Library & Information Association of South Africa and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Raliphada, L., & Botha, D. (2013). Testing the viability of Henczel’s information audit methodology in practice. South African Journal of Libraries and Information Science, 72(3). https://doi.org/10.7553/72-3-1121

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free