On inertia, injustice and the need for reform: introduction to a special issue on implications of the Folbigg case for the Australian criminal legal system

1Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The wrongful conviction of Kathleen Folbigg, who spent over 20 years in custody, is unarguably one of Australia's worst, acknowledged, miscarriages of justice. This special issue considers the implications of the Folbigg ‘case’, including opportunities missed to correct the flawed convictions, the continuing role of gendered ideologies that supported and maintained her convictions, and institutional failures in the judicial and executive branches of government. In addition to outlining some of the common themes and concerns of the authors who have contributed to this special issue, this introduction provides necessarily brief overview of the timeline and procedural history of the case. The timeline draws attention to comparable cases from other jurisdictions where mothers were wrongfully convicted of harming their children, but where errors were identified and corrected far more quickly. The introduction concludes by reiterating the need for reforms to provide independent review mechanisms to identify and correct errors in the Australian criminal legal system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

San Roque, M., & Cunliffe, E. (2026). On inertia, injustice and the need for reform: introduction to a special issue on implications of the Folbigg case for the Australian criminal legal system. Current Issues in Criminal Justice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2026.2645866

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free