Impact of routine preoperative 18FDG PET/CT on the surgical management of primary colorectal cancer

2Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: Determine the usefulness of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) in the preoperative setting of colorectal cancer (CRC), assessing its impact on changes in management strategy. Methods: Retrospective study of CRC patients who underwent preoperative 18FDG-PET/CT and CT staging scans in a single referral center. The agreement between 18FDG-PET/CT, contrast-enhanced CT, and colonoscopy for the surgical location was compared using the κ coefficient. Maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) value was obtained. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted. Results: One hundred ninety-five patients were included. 18FDG-PET/CT improved tumor localization in 84.6% (165/195) of cases (κ value 0.798, p < 0.001), thus correcting endoscopic errors 69.7% (30/43) of the time. In patients with incomplete colonoscopies, 18FDG-PET/CT detected synchronous tumors in 2.5% (5/195) patients, overlooked by CT staging scans. Based on extracolonic 18FDG-uptake, the second primary malignancy was diagnosed in 7(3.6%,7/195) patients and total accuracy for lymph node and distant metastasis was 66.1% and 98.4%, respectively. The treatment plan was altered in 30 (15.4%, 30/196) patients. There was a significant association between the SUVmax and tumor size (odds ratio [OR] 4.254, p = 0.003) and the depth of tumor invasion (OR 1.696, p = 0.026). Conclusions: Based on its ability to aid in preoperative evaluation and definitively alter surgical treatment planning, 18FDG-PET/CT should be further evaluated in primary CRC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mogollón-González, M., Conde-Muiño, R., Rodríguez-Fernández, A., Navarro-Pelayo, M., Domínguez-Bastante, M., & Palma, P. (2023). Impact of routine preoperative 18FDG PET/CT on the surgical management of primary colorectal cancer. Journal of Surgical Oncology, 128(2), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.27291

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free