Abstract
Starting from a lawsuit filed by the Debtor against the banking and financing institution PT. Pemodalan Nasional Madani (PNM) Lamongan branch to the Lamongan Religious Court regarding alleged violations of unlawful acts, namely the auction of a plot of house used as collateral at PT. PNM. The reason for filing a lawsuit with the Lamongan Religious Court is because the agreement agreed upon by the parties is a Mudharabah contract. In the trial process at the Lamongan Religious Court with registration No. 1/G.S/2023/PA.Lmg. by issuing a verdict before the parties, the Plaintiff and the defendant were given the opportunity to make answers, namely the reading of the lawsuit, the submission of duplicate replica answers from the defendant. However, after the submission of the mediation results failed, then the court gave a ruling with a dictum that the plaintiff's lawsuit was unacceptable because it was considered that the plaintiff's lawsuit was obscure lible. From this description, the researcher is interested in studying the decisions of religious courts and the review of procedural law in religious courts.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Abd Hafid, & Faizatul Arif, A. (2024). Analisis Hukum Acara Peradilan Agama terhadap Putusan Pengadilan Agama dengan No Register 1/PDT.G.S/2023/PA.LMG. MASADIR: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 4(02), 930–946. https://doi.org/10.33754/masadir.v4i02.1290
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.