Comparison of Survival after Transoral Robotic Surgery vs Nonrobotic Surgery in Patients with Early-Stage Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Abstract

Importance: Transoral robotic surgery has been widely adopted since approval by the US Food and Drug Administration in December 2009, despite limited comparative data. Objective: To compare the long-term outcomes of transoral robotic surgery with those of nonrobotic surgery for patients with early-stage oropharyngeal cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort comparative effectiveness analysis was performed of patients in the National Cancer Database with clinical T1 and T2 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015, who underwent definitive robotic and nonrobotic surgery. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis and propensity score matching were performed in patients with known human papillomavirus status to adjust for patient- A nd disease-related covariates. Survival after robotic and nonrobotic surgery was also compared in 3 unrelated cancers: Prostate, endometrial, and cervical cancer. Statistical analysis was performed from April 10, 2019, to May 21, 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival. Results: Of 9745 patients (7652 men [78.5%]; mean [SD] age, 58.8 [9.6] years) who met inclusion criteria, 2694 (27.6%) underwent transoral robotic surgery. There was a significant increase in the use of robotic surgery from 18.3% (240 of 1309) to 35.5% (654 of 1841) of all surgical procedures for T1 and T2 oropharyngeal cancers from 2010 to 2015 (P =.003). Robotic surgery was associated with lower rates of positive surgical margins (12.5% [218 of 1746] vs 20.3% [471 of 2325]; P