I deficiency diseases remain a health problem even in some developed countries. Therefore, measurement of I intake and knowledge about food choice related to I intake is important. We examined I intake in 4649 randomly selected participants from two cities in Denmark (Copenhagen and Aalborg) with an expected difference in I intake. I intake was assessed both by a food frequency questionnaire and by measuring I in casual urine samples. I excretion was expressed as a concentration and as estimated 24-h I excretion. Further, subgroups with low I intake were recognized. I intake was lower in Aalborg than in Copenhagen for all expressions, and lower than recommended in both cities if I intake from supplements was not included. Milk was the most important I source, accounting for about 44 % of the I intake, and milk ( P <0·001) and fish ( P =0·009) intake was related to I excretion in a multiple linear regression model. Thus, risk groups for low I intake were individuals with a low milk intake, those with a low intake of fish and milk, those not taking I supplements and those living in Aalborg where the I content in drinking water is lower. Even individuals who followed the advice regarding intake of 200–300 g fish/week and 0·5 litres milk/d had an intake below the recommended level if living in Aalborg.
CITATION STYLE
Rasmussen, L. B., Ovesen, L., Bülow, I., Jørgensen, T., Knudsen, N., Laurberg, P., & Perrild, H. (2002). Dietary iodine intake and urinary iodine excretion in a Danish population: effect of geography, supplements and food choice. British Journal of Nutrition, 87(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1079/bjn2001474
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.