A prognostic system for transient ischemia or minor stroke

75Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To build a prognostic system for patients with carotid transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. Design: Inception cohort study with 2-year follow-up. Setting: Urban community teaching hospital. Patients: Eligible patients (n = 142), identified on a carotid ultrasound roster, had been hospitalized between 1984 and 1987 within 30 days of a first carotid transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. Measurements: Stroke or death within 2 years. Main Results: Three factors were associated with stroke or death: age of more than 65 years, diabetes, and hypertension. Based on regression coefficients, age of more than 65 years was assigned 3 points; diabetes, 3 points; and hypertension, 2 points. An initial prognostic system comprised risk groups 1 (0 points), 2 (1 to 5 points), and 3 (6 to 8 points). Outcome rates in the three groups were 2%, 31%, and 54% (P < 0.0001), respectively. In an independent test sample, the corresponding outcome rates for the initial system were 12%, 21%, and 31% (P = 0.04). A final prognostic system, including two additional predictors (coronary heart disease [1 point] and the distinction between stroke and transient ischemic attack for the baseline event [2 points]), comprised risk groups 1 (0 to 2 points), 2 (3 to 6 points), and 3 (7 to 11 points). Corresponding outcome rates were 3%, 27%, and 48% (P < 0.001) in the original cohort and 10%, 21%, and 59% (P < 0.001) in the test cohort. Conclusion: For selected patients with carotid transient ischemia or minor stroke, five clinical features can be combined to stratify effectively the risk for a subsequent stroke or death.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kernan, W. N., Horwitz, R. I., Brass, L. M., Viscoli, C. M., & Taylor, K. J. W. (1991). A prognostic system for transient ischemia or minor stroke. Annals of Internal Medicine, 114(7), 552–557. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-114-7-552

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free