Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) is an important risk factor in patients with CKD, and some medications for treating CKD-MBD have been recently marketed. Because assessment of health-care costeffectiveness is growing in importance with increases in health expenditures, several cost-effectiveness analyses for new medications such as sevelamer, lanthanum carbonate, cinacalcet hydrochloride, and paricalcitol have been conducted. The results of these analyses have stimulated discussion on the efficient use of these medications and, in some cases, have affected treatment recommendation. However, most of these studies had methodological problems, one of them being that the effectiveness of medications was estimated based on changes of surrogate parameters, such as vascular calcification or serum biochemistry values. Furthermore, even if cost-effectiveness analyses were based on a given clinical trial, the results might differ from country to country. To provide greater health benefits under limited health expenditures based on the results of cost-effectiveness analyses, it is necessary to confirm the effectiveness of medications through welldesigned clinical trials having mortality as the primary end point. In addition, cost-effectiveness analyses need to be performed separately for each country. © 2013 International Society of Nephrology.
CITATION STYLE
Goto, S., Komaba, H., Fukagawa, M., & Nishi, S. (2013, December 2). Optimizing the cost-effectiveness of treatment for chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder. Kidney International Supplements. Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/kisup.2013.95
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.