Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic devices are increasing in prevalence. The post-implant follow-up is important for monitoring both device function and patient condition. However, practice is inconsistent. For example, ICD follow-up schedules vary from 3 monthly to yearly according to facility and physician preference and availability of resources. Recommended follow-up schedules impose significant burden. Importantly, no surveillance occurs between follow-up visits. In contrast, implantable devices with automatic remote monitoring capability provide a means for performing constant surveillance, with the ability to identify salient problems rapidly. Remote home monitoring reduces the volume of device clinic visits and provides early detection of patient and/or system problems. © 2013 © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Varma, N., & Ricci, R. P. (2013, July 1). Telemedicine and cardiac implants: What is the benefit? European Heart Journal. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehs388
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.