Terapia trombolítica en TEP submasivo/riesgo intermedio: Evidencias y sugerencias post estudio Pulmonary Embolism Thrombolysis (PEITHO)

2Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Therapy for submassive pulmonary embolism (intermediate risk), remains controversial. New evidence has appeared that may help us in the process of decision making. We review the relevant literature, outline prognostic factors, and discuss current recommendations and controversies regarding the available alternatives such as systemic and catheter-directed thrombolytic use.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marín V., A., Gazmuri B., J. T., Andresen V., M., & Andresen, M. (2015). Terapia trombolítica en TEP submasivo/riesgo intermedio: Evidencias y sugerencias post estudio Pulmonary Embolism Thrombolysis (PEITHO). Revista Medica de Chile, 143(7), 895–904. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872015000700011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free