De novo non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after pancreatectomy: A systematic review

1Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND As operative techniques and mortality rates of pancreatectomy have improved, there has been a shift in focus to maintaining and improving the nutritional status of these patients as we continue to learn more about post-operative complications. Although pancreatic endocrine and exocrine insufficiencies are known complications of pancreatectomy, increased longevity of these patients has also led to a higher incidence of de novo fatty liver disease which differs from traditional fatty liver disease given the lack of metabolic syndrome. AIM To identify and summarize patterns and risk factors of post-pancreatectomy de novo fatty liver disease to guide future management. METHODS We performed a database search on PubMed selecting papers published between 2001 and 2022 in the English language. PubMed was last accessed 1 June 2022. RESULTS Various factors influence the development of de novo fatty liver including indication for surgery (benign vs malignant), type of pancreatectomy, amount of pancreas remnant, and peri-operative nutritional status. With an incidence rate up to 75%, de novo non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) can develop within 12 mo after pancreatectomy and various risk factors have been established including pancreatic resection line and remnant pancreas volume, peri-operative malnutrition and weight loss, pancreatic exocrine insufficiency (EPI), malignancy as the indication for surgery, and postmenopausal status. CONCLUSION Since majority of risk factors leads to EPI and malnutrition, peri-operative focus on nutrition and enzymes replacement is key in preventing and treating de novo NAFLD after pancreatectomy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shah, P., Patel, V., & Ashkar, M. (2022). De novo non-alcoholic fatty liver disease after pancreatectomy: A systematic review. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 10(35), 12946–12958. https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i35.12946

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free