Comparative of Face-to-Face, Blended and On-line scenarios in Higher Education: Analysis of its effects on academic results considering the interaction with e-learning platforms

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The aim of this work is to analyze the effect of face-to-face, blended and on-line scenarios on students’ academic results considering the interaction with e-learning platforms. The results show that academic results are not affected by the learning scenario, while the degree of interaction with e-learning platforms is affected by the learning scenario. Furthermore, Treatment Effects model has been used to study the learning scenario and the interaction with e-learning platforms together. In this case, the academic results are affected by the on-line versus the face-to-face scenario but are not affected by the blended versus the face-to-face scenario. Specifically, on an average value of 4,14 points, obtained from the academic results of all students, with an on-line treatment, the results drop 1,01 points (24,41%), while with a blended treatment, the results drop 0,38 points (9,13%). Finally, utilizing Fractional Polynomial Extended Regress, prediction models are proposed for each of the scenarios.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Puche Regaliza, J. C., Porras Alfonso, S., Casado Yusta, S., & Pacheco Bonrostro, J. (2023). Comparative of Face-to-Face, Blended and On-line scenarios in Higher Education: Analysis of its effects on academic results considering the interaction with e-learning platforms. Revista de Investigacion En Educacion, 21(2), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.35869/reined.v21i2.4607

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free