Alternate-day feeding leads to improved glucose regulation on fasting days without significant weight loss in genetically obese mice

11Citations
Citations of this article
53Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Alternate-day fasting (ADF) is effective for weight loss and increases insulin sensitivity in diet-induced obese rodents. However, the efficacy of ADF in genetic models of obesity has not been comprehensively studied. Mice that are deficient in leptin (ob/ob mice) are obese, diabetic, and prone to deep bouts of torpor when fasted. We tested the hypotheses that an ADF protocol in ob/ob mice would result in 1) induction of torpor on fasted days, 2) minimal body weight loss if the mice experienced torpor, and 3) no improvement in glucose control in the absence of weight loss. Female ob/ob mice and littermate controls were assigned to 1) an ad libitum regimen or 2) an ADF regimen, consisting of fasting every other day with ad libitum feeding between fasts. Over a 19-day period, littermate control mice on the ADF regimen consumed the same amount of food as littermate control mice on the ad libitum regimen, whereas the ADF ob/ob mice consumed 37% less food than ad libitum ob/ob mice. Fasting days, but not fed days, led to torpor in both genotypes. Fasting days, but not fed days, led to weight loss in both genotypes relative to ad libitum controls. Fasting days, but not fed days, produced enhanced insulin sensitivity in both genotypes and normalized circulating glucose in ob/ob mice. These data demonstrate improved glucose control on fasting days with the use of ADF in a genetic model of obesity in the face of minimal weight loss.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Swoap, S. J., Bingaman, M. J., Hult, E. M., & Sandstrom, N. J. (2019). Alternate-day feeding leads to improved glucose regulation on fasting days without significant weight loss in genetically obese mice. American Journal of Physiology - Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology, 317(3), R461–R469. https://doi.org/10.1152/AJPREGU.00140.2019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free