Classic predictions about sex change do not hold under all types of size advantage

9Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Theory predicts that the 'size advantage' (rate of increase in male and female fitness with age or size) determines the direction and the timing of sex change in sequential hermaphrodites. Whereas the size advantage is generated by the mating system and would be expected to vary within and between species, the shape or form of the size advantage has rarely been estimated directly. Here, we ask whether theoretical predictions about the timing of sex change hold under different types of size advantage. We model two biological scenarios representing different processes generating the size advantage and find that different types of size advantage can produce patterns that qualitatively differ from classic predictions. Our results demonstrate that a good understanding of sequentially hermaphroditic mating systems, and specifically, a direct assessment of the processes underlying the size advantage is crucial to reliably predict and explain within-species patterns of the timing of sex change. © 2010 The Authors. Journal Compilation © 2010 European Society For Evolutionary Biology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kazancioǧlu, E., & Alonzo, S. H. (2010). Classic predictions about sex change do not hold under all types of size advantage. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 23(11), 2432–2441. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02108.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free