Emergency Department Length of Stay and in-Hospital Mortality of Non-Traumatic Patients in a University Hospital

2Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the emergency department length of stay (EDLOS) and mortality in each Emergency Severity Index (ESI) triage level. In addition to identifying the cut-off point of EDLOS to predict 72-hour in-hospital mortality among adult non-traumatic patients in the ED of a university hospital. Material and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted by retrieving patient data from the hospital information system; from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018. Patient characteristics, EDLOS, and in-hospital mortality rates were analyzed using the R program. The cut-off values of EDLOS, via the area under the curve for the best prediction of 72-hour in-hospital mortality in patients at different ESI levels, were analyzed by multivariate analysis. Statistical significance was defined as a p-value of ≤0.05. Results: Data from 71,247 patients with 123,356 visits were enrolled. EDLOS significantly decreased across ESI levels and the in-hospital mortality rates were highest in ESI 1, followed by ESI 2 and ESI 3. The predictive ability of EDLOS was the highest for ESI 4, followed by ESI 3. The cut-off point of EDLOS at 3.58 hours showed the best sensitivity, which was a significant risk factor for mortality after adjusting for other significant variables. An EDLOS longer than 4 hours was a significant factor for poor survival in patients with ESI 2 and ESI 3. Conclusion: A practical cut-off point of 4 hours EDLOS can be used to predict 72-hour in-hospital mortality. Healthcare providers in the ED should consider EDLOS as a safety indicator for quality assurance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sookmee, W., Liabsuetrakul, T., Tantarattanapong, S., & Wuthisuthimethawee, P. (2024). Emergency Department Length of Stay and in-Hospital Mortality of Non-Traumatic Patients in a University Hospital. Journal of Health Science and Medical Research, 42(3). https://doi.org/10.31584/jhsmr.20231018

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free