Comparison of aerosol products retrieved from AERONET, MICROTOPS and MODIS over a tropical urban city, Pune, India

87Citations
Citations of this article
112Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aerosol Optical Depth (AOD) measurements from Aerosol Robotic NETwork (AERONET; level 2.0), Microtops - II sun-photometer and MODerate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) (Terra and Aqua; level 2, collection 5, dark target) were compared and used to characterize aerosols over Pune, India. AODs from Microtops and MODIS were compared with those measured by AERONET to evaluate the measurement quality. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic comparison of MODIS aerosol products over Pune, India. The results of the analysis show that during 2008-10, 68% to 84% of the MODIS AODs fell within an expected error, as defined by the MODIS science team, and thus the retrievals from this system are validated and accepted. In addition, during pre-monsoon periods MODIS retrievals are better-matched with ground-based measurements. On the seasonal scale, MODIS retrievals corroborate well with ground-based measurements, with correlation coefficients ranging from 0.62 to 0.93. Despite an overall satellite-ground agreement, MODIS tends to under-estimate AOD during winter, and this may be due to improper assumptions of surface reflectance and the incorrect selection of aerosol types. AERONET retrieved single scattering albedo (SSA) values in winter (0.82-0.86), suggesting the dominance of absorbing aerosols, slightly increased (0.87-0.89) in pre-monsoon season, indicating more scattering type of aerosols. These values are about 8.9%-1.1% lower than those of the assumed SSA values in the MODIS algorithm. © Taiwan Association for Aerosol Research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

More, S., Pradeep Kumar, P., Gupta, P., Devara, P. C. S., & Aher, G. R. (2013). Comparison of aerosol products retrieved from AERONET, MICROTOPS and MODIS over a tropical urban city, Pune, India. Aerosol and Air Quality Research, 13(1), 107–121. https://doi.org/10.4209/aaqr.2012.04.0102

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free