Recreation as a spatial good: Distance effects on changes in recreation visitation and benefits

5Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The effects of travel distance on visitation and associated recreation benefits are tested for a large national park. Visitor responses to a survey depicting various natural resource scenarios at Rocky Mountain National Park were used to estimate the effects of distance traveled on nature-based tourism behavior and benefits. Distance was a significant determinant in both the visitation and contingent valuation models. Long-distance visitors were more stable in their visitation patterns in the face of natural resource changes. Marginal recreational benefits per trip increased with distance but at a decreasing rate. However, in-state visitors accrued higher annual benefits because of greater trip frequency. The relative importance of visitor types can help private and public decision-makers better respond to different visitor needs. The findings also provide a unique perspective on consumer spatial tradeoffs and the national value of recreational resources.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Richardson, R. B., Loomis, J., & Weiler, S. (2006). Recreation as a spatial good: Distance effects on changes in recreation visitation and benefits. Review of Regional Studies, 36(3), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.52324/001c.8325

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free