SURG-12. “NANOPASTE” THERAPY AS POTENTIAL TREATMENT OPTION FOR RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA

  • Schwake M
  • Grauer O
  • Holling M
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We recently showed that intracavitary thermotherapy with superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles can induce persistent inflammatory reactions which might lead to long-term stabilization in recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) patients. METHODS: Here, we report further data from a series of ten recurrent GBM WHO IV patients (IDH WT, MGMT: methylated 30%, unmethylated 70%; median age: 59 years) who were treated with intracavitary thermotherapy after coating the resection cavity wall (“NanoPaste”) with NanoTherm® particles (MagForce AG, Berlin, Germany). All patients underwent six one-hour semi-weekly hyperthermia sessions in an alternating magnetic field (mean maximum temperature 52.3° C, SD +/-6.0 °C). Six patients received concurrent radiotherapy at a dose of 39.6 Gy (5 x 1.8 Gy/week). RESULTS: No major side effects were observed during active treatment. However, all patients developed cerebral edema and increasing clinical symptoms during treatment follow-up (median 92 days, range 73 to 144). Patients were treated with dexamethasone and, if necessary, underwent re-operation to remove nanoparticles (n=5). Histopathology revealed sustained necrosis and large amounts of nanoparticles without evidence for tumor activity as well as a prominent inflammatory reaction characterized by increased T-cell and myeloid cell infiltration. Median overall survival (mOS) for the study population was 10.1 months (CI 95% 8.0-12.2). A survival benefit was observed for patients treated at first recurrence (n=5) when compared to patients treated at second recurrence or later (mOS = 20.6 vs 9.4 months). Patients who received thermotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy (n=6) showed longer mOS than patients treated with thermotherapy alone (17.3 vs 8.6 months). Two patients had long-lasting treatment responses > 23 months with one patient still alive at 3.5 years after treatment without receiving any further therapy. CONCLUSION: Our results warrant further investigations. A European clinical registry will be rolled out to further evaluate the potential of “NanoPaste” therapy for patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schwake, M., Grauer, O., Holling, M., Brokinkel, B., Müther, M., Bruns, A.-K., … Stummer, W. (2019). SURG-12. “NANOPASTE” THERAPY AS POTENTIAL TREATMENT OPTION FOR RECURRENT GLIOBLASTOMA. Neuro-Oncology, 21(Supplement_6), vi242–vi242. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/noz175.1013

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free