Health System Quality and Performance Indicators for Evaluating Home Care Programming: A Scoping Review

4Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A systematic scoping review of health system Performance and Quality Indicators (PQI) related literature for evaluating publicly funded home care programming was conducted. Through the scoping review we identify PQIs, map these based on quadrants of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement’s (IHI) Quadruple Aim, classify these PQIs under general “areas of focus” categories, and present recommendations for use. We selected all articles that identified, referenced, proposed, and/or described at least 1 PQI to measure home care service programming. Minimum inclusion criteria were a description of 1 or more PQIs designed to evaluate and/or measure home care programming, outcomes of home care clients and/or caregivers, or overall system impacts of home care service provision. The review identified 3,475 citations. A review of the abstracts led to the retrieval of 510 full-text articles for assessment of which 105 articles were selected for detailed review and extraction of identified PQIs. Of the 105 identified articles a total of 829 unique PQIs were gathered. Based on the IHI Quadruple Aim, 661 unique measures were identified as Clinical Outcome, 35 as Healthcare Provider Satisfaction, 99 Patient Experience, and 34 in the Financial/Sustainability quadrants. Many patient outcome specific PQIs exist, followed by patient experience measures. Very few PQIs exist in the financial or healthcare provider experience quadrants. The lack of indicators across all the IHI Quadruple Aim quadrants is an opportunity for further development supporting home care quality oversight.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jajszczok, M., Eastwood, C. A., Quan, H., Scott, L. D., Gutscher, A., & Zhao, R. (2023). Health System Quality and Performance Indicators for Evaluating Home Care Programming: A Scoping Review. Home Health Care Management and Practice, 35(4), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223231170019

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free