Multi-investigator collaboration in orthopedic surgery research compared to other medical fields: Update comparing 2021−2009

5Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of multicenter studies in the orthopedic literature compared to general medicine and other surgical subspecialty studies as an update to a previous study. The number of multicenter research studies across three orthopedic surgery journals was higher in 2021 compared to 2009 (7.2% [95% CI: 5.1%−9.4%, χ2 [df = 1 = 43.8]], p < 0.0001), as was the number of authors and institutions listed on clinical research studies. While these trends in multicenter research publishing are encouraging, orthopedic surgery still lags behind the general medicine and other surgical subspecialty literature bases. Of the 934 orthopedic surgery studies published, 92 (9.9%) were multicenter studies compared to 64.4% of the general medicine and 26.9% of the other surgical subspecialty studies (χ2 [df = 2] = 472.6, p < 0.001). Multicenter trials conducted in orthopedics have fundamentally changed musculoskeletal care, affecting the lives of millions of patients. Participation in multicenter research should be encouraged and prioritized through continued advocacy, funding, support, and direction from orthopedic governing bodies, journals, and subspecialty groups.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kuhn, A. W., Rund, J. M., Wolf, B. R., & Brophy, R. H. (2024). Multi-investigator collaboration in orthopedic surgery research compared to other medical fields: Update comparing 2021−2009. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 42(4), 873–877. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25703

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free