Ureteric Complications and Urinary Tract Reconstruction Techniques in Renal Transplantation: A Surgical Essay

7Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Renal transplantation (RT) remains the gold standard for end-stage renal disease, offering superior outcomes versus dialysis. Despite advances, ureteric complications (leaks/strictures) persist, primarily from ischemic injury, posing substantial graft risks. We review etiology, incidence, and management strategies for post-RT ureteric complications, focusing on surgical reconstruction techniques. Methods: Literature assessment examined ischemic-related ureteric complications. Primary outcomes: incidence, success, complication rates, operative times, and long-term patency. Secondary outcomes: graft/patient survival and reoperation rates. Techniques evaluated included extravesical Lich–Gregoir (L-G) and transvesical Leadbetter–Politano (L-P) ureteroneocystostomy (UNC), Boari flap with psoas hitch, pyelo/ureteroureterostomy, pyelovesicostomy, and ureteroenterostomy. Surgical indications, procedural details, advantages, disadvantages, and quantitative outcomes were systematically analyzed. Results: Ureteric complication incidence ranged from 1 to 15%, with ischemic injury as the primary cause. L-G UNC demonstrated lower complication rates than L-P (6.15% vs. 8.33%) with reduced operative times. Pyelo/ureteroureterostomy achieved excellent salvage outcomes (>90% success, 3.9% reintervention rate). Boari flap provides a suitable option for extensive ureteric defects, consistently preserving graft function without stricture recurrences. Pyelovesicostomy showed 80% long-term success in complex cases. Ureteroenterostomy achieved comparable 5-year graft survival (63%) to standard drainage, despite higher infection rates (65%). Pyelovesicostomy and ureteroenterostomy remain important solutions for specific challenging scenarios. Conclusions: Urinary reconstruction technique selection should be individualized based on anatomical considerations, pathology, and surgical expertise. Comprehensive understanding of reconstruction techniques enables effective management of ureteric complications, preserving graft function and improving outcomes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Novacescu, D., Abol-Enein, H., Latcu, S., Zara, F., Secasan, C. C., Barbos, V., … Cumpanas, A. A. (2025, June 1). Ureteric Complications and Urinary Tract Reconstruction Techniques in Renal Transplantation: A Surgical Essay. Journal of Clinical Medicine. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124129

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free