Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: Echocardiographic vs semiautomatic device algorithms

10Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Large evidence supports the importance of individualized optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with congestive heart failure. The aim of this study was to compare a recently developed intracardiac electrogram (IEGM)-based method with the Doppler echocardiographic (ECHO)-based method to calculate optimal atrioventricular (AV) and interventricular (VV) delays. Ten male patients implanted with a St Jude Medical resynchronization device received AV and VV delay assessment with both the IEGM and the ECHO-based methods. Estimates of the optimal AV and VV delays assessed by the 2 tested methods proved highly comparable. No difference emerged between the IEGM (126.8±22.7) and the ECHO (127.3±19.8) AV delay values (P=.987). The VV delay suggested by ECHO was highly significantly correlated with the delays calculated by the IEGM method (35±27.6 vs 21.31±24.31; r2=0.78; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anselmino, M., Antolini, M., Amellone, C., Piovano, E., Massa, R., & Trevi, G. P. (2009). Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy: Echocardiographic vs semiautomatic device algorithms. Congestive Heart Failure, 15(1), 14–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-7133.2008.00036.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free