Death, entropy, creativity and perpetual perishing: Some thoughts from whitehead and stengers

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, I argue that we need to rethink how we conceive of death as "inevitable". There are two main strands to my analysis. First, I use the work of Stengers to trace the complex and, occasionally, contradictory ways in which the concept of entropy was developed within physics in the 19th and 20th century. I argue that this has led to a general but ill-conceived notion of the universe as wasting away, as dying. This is a form of inevitability which has infected our understanding of what constitutes the death of individual humans. I then turn to the contrast that Whitehead draws between creativity and "perpetual perishing". I suggest that this contrast might help us to develop a wider, more coherent, approach to thinking about the status of death, and its supposed inevitability. In the final section, I reflect upon my father's death in 2013 in light of some of the concepts and problems raised throughout the paper.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Halewood, M. (2015). Death, entropy, creativity and perpetual perishing: Some thoughts from whitehead and stengers. Social Sciences, 4(3), 655–667. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci4030655

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free