Introduction: Recent studies have demonstrated the feasibility of uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) with a temporary switch to dabigatran (“dabigatran bridge”) for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We compared the effectiveness and safety between uninterrupted DOACs with and without the “dabigatran bridge” in patients taking factor Xa inhibitors. Methods: AF patients on factor Xa inhibitors (rivaroxaban/apixaban/edoxaban) undergoing catheter ablation were eligible (n = 348). Brain MRI was performed within 2 days after the procedure to detect silent cerebral events (SCEs). Rivaroxaban/apixaban/edoxaban were uninterruptedly used in 153 patients (Group 1); these DOACs were switched to dabigatran on the day of AF ablation in 195 patients (Group 2). After propensity score matching, the unfractionated heparin (UFH) amount and the activated clotting time (ACT) kinetics during the procedure, the SCE incidence, and the follow-up complications (30 days, thromboembolism and major/minor bleeding) in the two groups were compared. Results: Group 2 had higher initial ACT value and shorter time to optimal ACT (>300 seconds) than Group 1 (184 ± 36 s vs 145 ± 22 s, and 34 ± 29 s vs 43 ± 34 s, P
CITATION STYLE
Harada, M., Motoike, Y., Nomura, Y., Nishimura, A., Koshikawa, M., Murayama, K., … Ozaki, Y. (2020). Comparison of effectiveness and safety between uninterrupted direct oral anticoagulants with and without switching to dabigatran in atrial fibrillation ablation. Journal of Arrhythmia, 36(3), 417–424. https://doi.org/10.1002/joa3.12333
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.