What does Life-Cycle Assessment of agricultural products need for more meaningful inclusion of biodiversity?

48Citations
Citations of this article
214Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Decision-makers increasingly use life-cycle assessment (LCA) as a tool to measure the environmental sustainability of products. LCA is of particular importance in globalized agricultural supply chains, which have environmental effects in multiple and spatially dispersed locations. Incorporation of impacts on biodiversity that arise from agricultural production systems into environmental assessment methods is an emerging area of work in LCA, and current approaches have limitations, including the need for (i) improved assessment of impacts to biodiversity associated with agricultural production, (ii) inclusion of new biodiversity indicators (e.g. conservation value, functional diversity, ecosystem services) and (iii) inclusion of previously unaccounted modelling variables that go beyond land-use impacts (e.g. climate change, water and soil quality). Synthesis and applications. Ecological models and understanding can contribute to address the limitations of current life-cycle assessment (LCA) methods in agricultural production systems and to make them more ecologically relevant. This will be necessary to ensure that biodiversity is not neglected in decision-making that relies on LCA.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Teillard, F., Maia de Souza, D., Thoma, G., Gerber, P. J., & Finn, J. A. (2016). What does Life-Cycle Assessment of agricultural products need for more meaningful inclusion of biodiversity? Journal of Applied Ecology, 53(5), 1422–1429. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12683

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free