Fate of inorganic contaminants post treatment of acid mine drainage by cryptocrystalline magnesite: Complimenting experimental results with a geochemical model

13Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study assessed the fate of inorganic contaminants post treatment of acid mine drainage by cryptocrystalline magnesite. To accomplish that, neutralization and metal attenuation were evaluated and complemented with simulations using geochemical modeling. Mineral phase formation and changes during the reaction of magnesite and AMD were also evaluated. The geochemical computer code PHREEQC and WATEQ4 database was used for geochemical modelling of the process water. Interaction of AMD with magnesite at an optimum solid: liquid ratio of 1:100 and contact time of 60 min led to an increase in pH, reaching a maximum pH of 10, resulting in significant precipitation of most metal species. Increase of pH in solution with contact time caused the removal of the metal ions mainly by precipitation, co-precipitation and adsorption. Sulphate concentration was lowered from 4640 down to 1910 mg/L. Fe was mainly removed as Fe(OH)3, goethite, and jarosite, Al as basaluminite, boehmite and jurbanite, Al(OH)3 and as gibbsite and diaspore. Al and Fe precipitated as iron (oxy)-hydroxides and aluminium (oxy)-hydroxides. Mn precipitated as rhodochrosite and manganite. Ca was removed as gypsum. Sulphate was removed as gypsum, and Fe, Al hydroxyl sulphate minerals. Mg was removed as brucite and dolomite. Cryptocrystalline magnesite effectively neutralized AMD and attenuated concentration of inorganic species to within department of water affairs and sanitation (DWAS) water quality guidelines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Masindi, V., Gitari, M. W., Tutu, H., & De Beer, M. (2016). Fate of inorganic contaminants post treatment of acid mine drainage by cryptocrystalline magnesite: Complimenting experimental results with a geochemical model. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 4(4), 4846–4856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.03.020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free