System for application of controlled forces on dental implants in rat maxillae: Influence of the number of load cycles on bone healing

4Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Experimental studies on the effect of micromotion on bone healing around implants are frequently conducted in long bones. In order to more closely reflect the anatomical and clinical environments around dental implants, and eventually be able to experimentally address load-management issues, we have developed a system that allows initial stabilization, protection from external forces, and controlled axial loading of implants. Screw-shaped implants were placed on the edentulous ridge in rat maxillae. Three loading regimens were applied to validate the system; case A no loading (unloaded implant) for 14 days, case B no loading in the first 7 days followed by 7 days of a single, daily loading session (60 cycles of an axial force of 1.5 N/cycle), and case C no loading in the first 7 days followed by 7 days of two such daily loading sessions. Finite element modeling of the peri-implant compressive and tensile strains plus histological and immunohistochemical analyses revealed that in case B any tissue damage resulting from the applied force (and related interfacial strains) did not per se disturb bone healing, however, in case C, the accumulation of damage resulting from the doubling of loading sessions severely disrupted the process. These proof-of-principle results validate the applicability of our system for controlled loading, and provide new evidence on the importance of the number of load cycles applied on healing of maxillary bone.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Barros e Lima Bueno, R., Dias, A. P., Ponce, K. J., Brunski, J. B., & Nanci, A. (2020). System for application of controlled forces on dental implants in rat maxillae: Influence of the number of load cycles on bone healing. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research - Part B Applied Biomaterials, 108(3), 965–975. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.34449

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free