Stakeholder views about a novel consumer health resource for knee osteoarthritis

14Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to explore consumers', clinicians', and arthritis advocates’ perceptions of a novel osteoarthritis (OA) information booklet that challenged existing beliefs, integrated a biopsychosocial perspective, and incorporated consumer voice and experience. Design: A mixed-methods study was conducted using an evaluation survey completed after first reading the booklet and subsequent focus groups with Thematic Analysis. Focus groups were conducted with consumers (people with OA; four groups; n = 19), general practitioners (two groups; n = 11), primary healthcare nurses (two groups; n = 14) and arthritis advocates (two groups; n = 12). Results: Quantitative data identified positive initial impressions of the booklet. Four key themes emerged from the focus groups related to: i) an informative and empowering booklet; ii) the need to be clear about the booklet's purpose and audience; iii) discordance between clinician, advocate, and consumer perspectives; and iv) information and advice conflicting with prior beliefs or experience. Conclusion: A novel information booklet was well received by consumers, clinicians, and arthritis advocates. New information resources can be improved in partnership with consumers and key stakeholders. Co-design with consumers needs to be carefully considered during resource development as consumer views often contrasted with professionals' perceptions of consumer needs. Successful implementation of updated OA information will require a multi-faceted approach that also targets clinicians’ knowledge and beliefs.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Darlow, B., Brown, M., Grainger, R., Hudson, B., Briggs, A. M., Haxby Abbott, J., & McKinlay, E. (2020). Stakeholder views about a novel consumer health resource for knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage Open, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100058

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free