Does visualisation during urethrocystoscopy provide pain relief? Results of an observational study

10Citations
Citations of this article
33Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: To measure the effects of real-time visualisation during urethrocystoscopy on pain in patients who underwent ambulatory urethrocystoscopy. Methods: An observational study was designed. From June 2012 to June 2013 patients who had ambulatory urethrocystoscopy participated in the study. In order to measure pain perception we used a numeric rating scale (NRS) 0 to 10. Additional data was collected including gender, reason for intervention, use of a rigid or a flexible instrument and whether the patient had had urethrocystoscopy before. Results: 185 patients were evaluated. 125 patients preferred to watch their urethrocystoscopy on a real-time video screen, 60 patients did not. There was no statistically relevant difference in pain perception between those patients who watched their urethrocystoscopy on a real-time video screen and those who did not (p∈=∈0.063). However, men who were allowed to watch their flexible urethrocystoscopy experienced significantly less pain, than those who did not (p∈=∈0.007). No such effects could be measured for rigid urethrocystoscopy (p∈=∈0.317). Furthermore, women experienced significantly higher levels of pain during the urethrocystoscopy than men (p∈=∈0.032). Conclusions: Visualisation during urethrocystoscopy procedures in general does not significantly decrease pain in patients. Nevertheless, men who undergo flexible urethrocystoscopy should be offered to watch their procedure in real-time on a video screen. To make urethrocystoscopy less painful for both genders, especially for women, should be subject to further research.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Koenig, J., Sevinc, S., Frohme, C., Heers, H., Hofmann, R., & Hegele, A. (2015). Does visualisation during urethrocystoscopy provide pain relief? Results of an observational study. BMC Urology, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-015-0053-2

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free