Homburg's Lockdown Analysis: Conclusions without Data and an Appropriate Estimation Model

3Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This is a critical response to Homburg (2020) who claimed that lockdowns were superfluous and ineffective. We demonstrate that Homburg's database is not sufficient to support his claim and that his econometric approach not suitable for an analysis of the lockdowns' additional effect. However, we corroborate Homburg's observation that the number of infections was already receding when the German lockdown came into force.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robra, B. P., & Felder, S. (2020). Homburg’s Lockdown Analysis: Conclusions without Data and an Appropriate Estimation Model. Economists’ Voice, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2020-0015

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free