Rapid-Test Sensitivity for Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus in Humans

  • Faix D
  • Sherman S
  • Waterman S
245Citations
Citations of this article
108Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To the Editor: Faix et al. (Aug. 13 issue)1 highlight the moderate sensitivity of rapid antigen tests as compared with reverse-transcriptase–polymerase-chain-reaction (RT-PCR) assays in detecting the 2009 pandemic influenza A (H1N1) virus in infected patients. We found that the antigen tests had poor sensitivity to the virus when used in a subgroup of 21 patients in the Australian intensive care cohort with severe 2009 influenza A (H1N1) virus infection and acute lung injury that required mechanical ventilation.2 In these patients, rapid antigen tests (QuickVue A+B, Quidel) were performed on swabs from the nose and throat, and influenza type-specific immunofluorescent antigen . . .

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faix, D. J., Sherman, S. S., & Waterman, S. H. (2009). Rapid-Test Sensitivity for Novel Swine-Origin Influenza A (H1N1) Virus in Humans. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(7), 728–729. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmc0904264

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free