Ending the Stalemate: Toward a Theory of Anthro-Shift

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text


For years, sociologists who study society and the environment have focused on resolving the debate regarding the relationship between economic development and environmental degradation. Studies from a family of critical perspectives tend to find that economic development is antithetical to environmental protection, whereas a suite of more optimistic perspectives has uncovered more hopeful findings. We attempt to resolve these differences by situating this debate within the larger framework of the anthro-shift. The anthro-shift explains how the society-environment relationship changes over time. The theory assumes this relationship is the product of interrelations among the state, market, and civil society sectors. We focus on two distinctive qualities of the anthro-shift: the role risk plays as a pivot for reorienting how society interacts with the natural environment and the multidirectionality of the theory, highlighting how it combines elements of many of the dominant critical and optimistic perspectives into a broader framework.

Author supplied keywords




Fisher, D. R., & Jorgenson, A. K. (2019). Ending the Stalemate: Toward a Theory of Anthro-Shift. Sociological Theory, 37(4), 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275119888247

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free