Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in US hospitals with varying structural characteristics: Analysis of the NCDR®

9Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: In the United States, there continues to be debate about whether certain types of hospitals deliver improved patient outcomes. We sought to assess the association between hospital organizational characteristics and in-hospital outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Retrospective analysis of 2004 to 2007 data for 694 US hospitals participating in the CathPCI Registry®. Our analysis focused on 1,113,554 patients who underwent PCI in 471 not-for-profit (NFP) hospitals, 131 major teaching hospitals, 79 for-profit (FP) hospitals, and 13 physician-owned specialty hospitals. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, stroke, bleeding, vascular injury, and a composite representing one or more of the individual complications. We used the current CathPCI Registry mortality risk model to calculate risk-standardized mortality ratios (RSMRs) for each category of hospital and compared hospital groupings for all patients in aggregate and in subgroups stratified by patients' indications for PCI. Results: Patients treated in major teaching hospitals were younger, whereas FP hospitals performed a greater proportion of PCI for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cram, P., House, J. A., Messenger, J. C., Piana, R. N., Horwitz, P. A., & Spertus, J. A. (2012). Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in US hospitals with varying structural characteristics: Analysis of the NCDR®. American Heart Journal, 163(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.10.010

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free