Abstract
Background: In the United States, there continues to be debate about whether certain types of hospitals deliver improved patient outcomes. We sought to assess the association between hospital organizational characteristics and in-hospital outcomes for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: Retrospective analysis of 2004 to 2007 data for 694 US hospitals participating in the CathPCI Registry®. Our analysis focused on 1,113,554 patients who underwent PCI in 471 not-for-profit (NFP) hospitals, 131 major teaching hospitals, 79 for-profit (FP) hospitals, and 13 physician-owned specialty hospitals. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, stroke, bleeding, vascular injury, and a composite representing one or more of the individual complications. We used the current CathPCI Registry mortality risk model to calculate risk-standardized mortality ratios (RSMRs) for each category of hospital and compared hospital groupings for all patients in aggregate and in subgroups stratified by patients' indications for PCI. Results: Patients treated in major teaching hospitals were younger, whereas FP hospitals performed a greater proportion of PCI for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (P
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Cram, P., House, J. A., Messenger, J. C., Piana, R. N., Horwitz, P. A., & Spertus, J. A. (2012). Percutaneous coronary intervention outcomes in US hospitals with varying structural characteristics: Analysis of the NCDR®. American Heart Journal, 163(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2011.10.010
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.