Randomized controlled trials in industrial low back pain relating to return to work. Part 1. Acute interventions

50Citations
Citations of this article
38Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Employers and insurers are interested in being able to use cost-effective interventions for returning injured workers to the workplace. Unfortunately, truly objective information is lacking. The purpose of this and two subsequent review articles was to perform thorough scrutiny and methodologic comparison among all obtainable, published randomized and controlled studies on low back pain (LBP) interventions leading to return to work. The study was confined to English language articles published from 1975 through 1993. Of more than 4,000 LBP citations, more than 500 were chosen for review. Of that number, 35 articles met the selection criteria of randomization, reasonable controls, and work return comparisons. This paper focuses on the 10 articles relating to interventions for acute (less than 4 weeks) LBP, and considers bed rest, exercise, spinal manipulation, back school, and case management. A 26-point quality system was used to compare the methodologic rigor of each article. This literature survey demonstrated the meager scientific foundations on which our industrial rehabilitation programs are based. © 1995 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Scheer, S. J., Radack, K. L., & O’Brien, D. R. (1995). Randomized controlled trials in industrial low back pain relating to return to work. Part 1. Acute interventions. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(95)80076-X

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free