Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Perkara Peredaran Uang Palsu di Pengadilan Negeri Limboto

  • Santika Tuadingo
  • Suwitno Suwitno
  • Julisa Aprilia Kaluku
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This journal discusses the judge's considerations in the case of circulating counterfeit money at the Limboto District Court. By using normative research methods and statutory approaches and case approaches. Counterfeiting currency is considered a violation that can harm the interests of society. The case being studied is the decision of the Limboto District Court Number 119/Pid.B/2022/PN Lbo, where two defendants with the initials DT and CAL were found not guilty of the crime of forgery and circulation of counterfeit money. Even though the public prosecutor had presented evidence and witnesses, the judge acquitted the defendant because there was a discrepancy between the evidence presented and the counterfeit money distributed by the defendant.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Santika Tuadingo, Suwitno Suwitno, & Julisa Aprilia Kaluku. (2024). Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Perkara Peredaran Uang Palsu di Pengadilan Negeri Limboto. Federalisme: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Ilmu Komunikasi, 1(4), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.62383/federalisme.v1i4.235

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free