Communication Research Inequalities and the Prestige Dilemma: Negotiating International Recognition and Local Representation in Global South Journals

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article examines the editorial policies and structural characteristics of Global South-based communication, media, and journalism academic journals, analyzing how they balance the tension between seeking international recognition and addressing the needs of local audiences. Using two datasets—one detailing journal attributes and another mapping editorial board members—we investigated the websites of 71 SCImago Journal & Country Rank-indexed journals published across 27 non-Western countries. Findings reveal a prevailing adherence to Global North academic standards, which might constrain de-Westernization efforts and South-South collaboration. The strategies and challenges these outlets face underscore persistent inequalities in global knowledge production and visibility.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Marques, F. P. J., Asuman, M., Sobel Cohen, M., Ekdale, B., & Ibrahim, A. (2026). Communication Research Inequalities and the Prestige Dilemma: Negotiating International Recognition and Local Representation in Global South Journals. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 103(3), 798–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/10776990261439160

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free