Precipitating crises in families: patterns which connect

Abstract

This paper proposes that a stage in treatment common in all successful approaches to therapy is the precipitating of some degree of crisis, and that failure to provoke an element of crisis in terms of behaviour or beliefs in the family represents a ‘crisis’ for the therapist. Before considering the different approaches of three major schools of family therapy, it is first suggested that, at a more abstract level, ‘the patterns which connect’ (Bateson, 1979) the different schools provide a unifying framework to understand one of the aims of therapy. This is the intention to challenge established patterns to precipitate crisis. Three models of Family Therapy, Structural, Strategic, and Milan/Systemic, are outlined and their manner of precipitating crises described. Copyright © 1989, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved