Evaluation Advisory Groups: Considerations for Design and Management

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

An evaluation advisory group can be a vital resource, particularly for evaluations of collaboration-driven initiatives, but only if we effectively design the groups and engage their members. We discuss evaluation advisory groups using four themes: purposes, structures, processes, and pitfalls. Insights from a review and synthesis of the evaluation advisory group literature are integrated and illustrated with our own real-world experiences with evaluation advisory groups on a national and state/provincial scale, and in university and health system settings.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Voegeli, C., Schmitt-Boshnick, M., & Krupa, E. (2021). Evaluation Advisory Groups: Considerations for Design and Management. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 36(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.3138/CJPE.69949

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free