Abstract
An evaluation advisory group can be a vital resource, particularly for evaluations of collaboration-driven initiatives, but only if we effectively design the groups and engage their members. We discuss evaluation advisory groups using four themes: purposes, structures, processes, and pitfalls. Insights from a review and synthesis of the evaluation advisory group literature are integrated and illustrated with our own real-world experiences with evaluation advisory groups on a national and state/provincial scale, and in university and health system settings.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Voegeli, C., Schmitt-Boshnick, M., & Krupa, E. (2021). Evaluation Advisory Groups: Considerations for Design and Management. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 36(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.3138/CJPE.69949
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.