Emprego da cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência na determinação de cortisol sérico em substituição à técnica de radioimunoensaio

1Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The quantification of cortisol in different organic fluids has not only been applied to different human nosological conditions as a diagnostic aid but it has also been used in clinical research. In clinical application, cortisol is routinely measured by radioimmunoassay (RIA). In the determination of free urinary cortisol this technique has been replaced by the high-performance liquid chromatography mainly in the diagnosis of Cushing syndrome. As to serum cortisol determination, there is no evidence of the application of liquid chromatography as a substitute for other analytical techniques. Objective: The development of an analytical methodology using reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) to determine serum cortisol levels as a substitute for RIA in order to reduce radioactive waste. Material and methods: Cortisol was directly quantified by RP-HPLC in previously ether-extracted serum samples. Triamcinolone acetonide was used as internal standard (IS). The chromatographk separation was developed in a BDS-Hypersil-C18® column (125 × 4 mm, 5μ) using water-acetonitrile (72:28; v/v) as mobile phase at 1 milmin and steroid peaks were measured at 243 nm. Results: Cortisol and IS presented retention time of 3.4 and 7.1 min, respectively. The precision was less than 10% and accuracy was less than 4%. Discussion: The method was effective and efficient, with good sensitivity and linearity in the concentration range of 2.5 to 60.0μg/dl. Conclusion: The present methodology substitutes RIA at clinical application.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sugawara, E. K., Neto, L. M. R., De Oliveira, K. C., & Verreschi, L. T. D. N. (2008). Emprego da cromatografia líquida de alta eficiência na determinação de cortisol sérico em substituição à técnica de radioimunoensaio. Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial, 44(5), 337–342. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1676-24442008000500006

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free