The Moral Economy of High-Tech Modernism

9Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

While people in and around the tech industry debate whether algorithms are political at all, social scientists take the politics as a given, asking instead how this politics unfolds: how algorithms concretely govern. What we call “high-tech modernism”– the application of machine learning algorithms to organize our social, economic, and political life–has a dual logic. On the one hand, like traditional bureaucracy, it is an engine of classification, even if it categorizes people and things very differ-ently. On the other, like the market, it provides a means of self-adjusting allocation, though its feedback loops work differently from the price system. Perhaps the most important consequence of high-tech modernism for the contemporary moral political economy is how it weaves hierarchy and data-gathering into the warp and woof of everyday life, replacing visible feedback loops with invisible ones, and suggesting that highly mediated outcomes are in fact the unmediated expression of people’s own true wishes.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Farrell, H., & Fourcade, M. (2023). The Moral Economy of High-Tech Modernism. Daedalus, 152(1), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01982

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free