Measuring short-term and long-term physiological stress eVects by cortisol reactivity in saliva and hair

73Citations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose The aims of this study were to investigate (1) the concurrent relationship between short-term and long-term stress reactivity measured by cortisol excretion and (2) the relationship of these physiological stress eVects with selfreported stress and need for recovery after work (NFR). Methods Participants were production workers in the meat-processing industry. Short-term cortisol excretion was calculated by summing 18 saliva samples, sampled over a 3-day period. Samples were delivered by 37 participants. Twenty-nine of them also supplied one hair sample of at least 3 cm in length for an analysis of long-term (3 months) cortisol excretion. All of them Wlled in a short questionnaire on self-reported stress and NFR. Self-reported stress was assessed by a three-item stress screener; NFR was assessed by an 11-item scale. Results Short-term and long-term cortisol excretion are signiWcantly, but moderately, associated (r = 0.41, P = 0.03). Short-term and long-term cortisol excretion correlated weakly to self-reported stress and NFR (correlations varied from 0.04 to 0.21). Conclusions Short-term and long-term physiological stress excretion levels are moderately associated. Physiological stress eVects assessed from saliva and hair cannot be used interchangeably with self-reported stress because they only correlate weakly. To better predict long-term cortisol excretion in workers, the predictive value of short-term cortisol excretion must be evaluated in a prognostic longitudinal study in a working population. © Springer-Verlag 2012.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Van Holland, B. J., Frings-Dresen, M. H. W., & Sluiter, J. K. (2012). Measuring short-term and long-term physiological stress eVects by cortisol reactivity in saliva and hair. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health, 85(8), 849–852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00420-011-0727-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free