Interjurisdictional Accountability for Interjurisdictional Problems

  • Stacey J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
N/AReaders
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Emergencies in Canada are necessarily interjurisdictional affairs. They require multiple levels of government to play active roles at all stages of emergency management. The Rouleau Report documented numerous interjurisdictional failures in the 2022 Public Order Emergency, but the mandate and process limited the Commission's investigation of these issues. This commentary examines how past inquiries and long-standing practices in Canadian environmental law could serve as a model to improve interjurisdictional governance and accountability in emergencies. In particular, it recommends amending Section 63 of the Emergencies Act to empower the federal government to constitute a joint inquiry with other affected jurisdictions, including Indigenous Nations, to improve oversight, accountability and learning whenever the federal government invokes the Emergencies Act.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stacey, J. (2025). Interjurisdictional Accountability for Interjurisdictional Problems. Manitoba Law Journal, 46(1), 101. https://doi.org/10.29173/mlj1440

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free