Isolation and characterization of extracellular polysaccharides from the epipelic diatoms cylindrotheca closterium and navicula salinarum

31Citations
Citations of this article
142Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The production and composition of extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) in axenic batch cultures of the benthic marine epipelic diatoms Navicula salinarum and Cylindrotheca closterium were investigated. EPS was secreted into the medium and the bulk was loosely associated with the cells. Neither N. salinarum nor C. closterium formed a well-defined polysaccharide capsule. EPS of both N. salinarum and C. closterium consisted predominantly of polysaccharide but small quantities of protein were present as well. EPS also contained uronic acids and SO4−2 groups. Analysis of monosaccharides using gas chromatography showed that for both species glucose and xylose were the main constituents, but several other monosaccharides were present in smaller quantities. Two fractions of EPS were distinguished: a small amount was secreted into the medium and a second fraction was extracted in water at 30 °C. For both species the two fractions differed somewhat in composition, indicating that they represented two different types of EPS. The EPS produced by N. salinarum and by C. closterium differed in their composition. The rate of EPS production in batch culture was highest during the transition from exponential growth to stationary growth. Negatively charged groups such as uronic acids and sulphated sugars determine the adhesion capacity of EPS and probably play an important role in the stabilization of intertidal sediments on which these diatoms grow and produce biofilms. © 1999 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Staats, N., De Winder, B., Mur, L. R., & Stal, L. J. (1999). Isolation and characterization of extracellular polysaccharides from the epipelic diatoms cylindrotheca closterium and navicula salinarum. European Journal of Phycology, 34(2), 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670269910001736212

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free