Immunohistochemical detection of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptors and estrogen receptors by monoclonal antibodies: comparison of four immunoperoxidase methods

48Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We developed an immunohistochemical method for visualization of vitamin D (VDR) and estrogen receptors (ER) in cryostat sections, using monoclonal antibodies (MAb) to the vitamin D receptor and estrogen receptor, respectively. This method is based on an avidin-biotin labeling technique (LAB). To establish a reliable and sensitive method which can be used easily as a routine diagnostic procedure, we systematically compared four different immunoenzymatic methods with respect to their efficiency in detecting vitamin D and estrogen receptors. Compared to the indirect bridged avidin-biotin (IBRAB), the peroxidase- anti-peroxidase (PAP), and the avidin-biotin complex (ABC) methods, the LAB method produced stronger staining intensities and had higher detection efficiency for both vitamin D and estrogen receptors. In addition, the LAB method had a higher spatial resolution compared to the ABC technique in detection of VDR in normal human skin biopsies. In the case of steroid receptors, i.e., nuclear antigens, immunohistochemistry must deal with a relatively low number of antigenic sites per cell, restricted accessibility of the antigens, and slight differences in antigen concentrations among cells. Under these particular conditions, the chemical properties of the conjugates used in the LAB method may explain why it is superior to the other methods. Consequently, the LAB method is recommended for visualization of ER and VDR.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Milde, P., Merke, J., Ritz, E., Haussler, M. R., & Rauterberg, E. W. (1989). Immunohistochemical detection of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 receptors and estrogen receptors by monoclonal antibodies: comparison of four immunoperoxidase methods. Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 37(11), 1609–1617. https://doi.org/10.1177/37.11.2553800

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free