Formation of mainstream cigarette smoke constituents prioritized by the World Health Organization - Yield patterns observed in market surveys, clustering and inverse correlations

39Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The WHO TobReg proposed mandating ceilings on selected smoke constituents determined from the market-specific median of nicotine-normalized yield distributions. Data validating this regulatory concept were obtained from essentially single-blend surveys. This process is strongly impacted by inverse correlations among yields. In the present study, 18 priority WHO smoke constituent yields (nicotine-normalized) were determined (using two smoking regimens) from 262 commercial brands including American, Virginia and local blends from 13 countries. Principal Component Analysis was used to identify yields patterns, clustering of blend types and the inverse correlations causing these clusters. Three principal components explain about 75% of total data variability. PC1 was sensitive to the relative levels of gas- and particle-phase compounds. PC2 and PC3 cluster American- and Virginia-blends, revealing inverse correlations: Nitrogen oxides and amino- or nitroso-aromatic compounds inversely correlate to either formaldehyde and acrolein, or benzo(a)pyrene and di-hydroxybenzenes. These results can be explained by reviewing the processes determining each components smoke delivery. Regulatory initiatives simultaneously targeting selected smoke constituents in markets with mixed blend styles will be strongly impacted by the inverse correlations described. It is difficult to predict the ultimate impact of such regulations on public health, considering the complex chemistry of cigarette smoke formation. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piadé, J. J., Wajrock, S., Jaccard, G., & Janeke, G. (2013). Formation of mainstream cigarette smoke constituents prioritized by the World Health Organization - Yield patterns observed in market surveys, clustering and inverse correlations. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 55, 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2013.01.016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free