Gearbox tooth cut fault diagnostics using acoustic emission and vibration sensors - A comparative

Citations of this article
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.


In recent years, acoustic emission (AE) sensors and AE-based techniques have been developed and tested for gearbox fault diagnosis. In general, AE-based techniques require much higher sampling rates than vibration analysis-based techniques for gearbox fault diagnosis. Therefore, it is questionable whether an AE-based technique would give a better or at least the same performance as the vibration analysis-based techniques using the same sampling rate. To answer the question, this paper presents a comparative study for gearbox tooth damage level diagnostics using AE and vibration measurements, the first known attempt to compare the gearbox fault diagnostic performance of AE- and vibration analysis-based approaches using the same sampling rate. Partial tooth cut faults are seeded in a gearbox test rig and experimentally tested in a laboratory. Results have shown that the AE-based approach has the potential to differentiate gear tooth damage levels in comparison with the vibration-based approach. While vibration signals are easily affected by mechanical resonance, the AE signals show more stable performance. © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.




Qu, Y., He, D., Yoon, J., Van Hecke, B., Bechhoefer, E., & Zhu, J. (2014). Gearbox tooth cut fault diagnostics using acoustic emission and vibration sensors - A comparative. Sensors (Switzerland), 14(1), 1372–1393.

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free