Interpretation of sonotubometric data based on phase-shift detection

0Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sonotubometry is a non-invasive means of assessing Eustachian tube (ET) function. Its interpretation remains a complex task with questionable results due to wide variation between trials. A study was conducted to ascertain whether the measurement of phase shift in sonotubometric signals would be a more reliable indicator of ET patency than fluctuating Sound Pressure Level (SPL). METHODS: The ears of six healthy participants and two participants with patulous ET (PET) were probed with a 100 Hz signal. Five recordings of SPL were performed at the external auditory canal. Cross-correlation was performed among filtered SPL signals and among extracted phase shift waveforms. Peak coefficients were averaged to provide a measure of waveform similarity between trials. RESULTS: Mean peak cross correlation coefficient for SPL signal measured 0.603 +/- 0.057 Standard Error of Mean (SEM) whilst that for Phase-Shift signal measured 0.884 +/- 0.027 (SEM). All normal participants demonstrated an observable phase change between the ear and nasal signal during swallowing indicating an acoustic impedance change during the event. For the PET patients tested, the phase measurements in ear and nasal signals follow one another reasonably closely, indicating little or no impedance change during swallowing. It is thought that this impedance change is indicative of opening of the ET in normal patients, and the lack impedance change indicates ET either remaining open or remaining closed throughout the swallow. CONCLUSIONS: Experimental data suggest that phase-shift detection is a more consistent means of interpreting sonotubometric data than SPL analysis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Amoako-Tuffour, Y., Garland, P., & Bance, M. (2016). Interpretation of sonotubometric data based on phase-shift detection. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40463-016-0151-5

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free